Evidence ledger

Type: Evidence ledger
Status: Active
Canonical for: Claim-level naming evidence, evidence strength, direct URLs and explicit non-claims
Depends on: Verified primary sources and documented design-system artifacts

IDClaim or observationEvidence labelSystem/domainExact artifactDirect URLWhat it provesWhat it does not prove
DS-01One kind contains hierarchy, consequence and appearance valuesDemonstratedCarbonButton usage/APIhttps://carbondesignsystem.com/components/button/usage/Public semantic dimensions are mixedThat agents select incorrectly
DS-02One appearance contains prominence, consequence and experience identityDemonstratedAtlassianButton docshttps://atlassian.design/components/button/Property labels do not guarantee one dimensionAgent effect size
DS-03appearance mixes hierarchy and visual treatment, with hierarchy supplied in proseDocumentedFluent 2React Button usagehttps://fluent2.microsoft.design/components/web/react/core/button/usageNames and prose work togetherMachine performance
DS-04variant, treatment and static-color are separateDemonstratedSpectrumButton APIhttps://opensource.adobe.com/spectrum-web-components/components/button/Public APIs can factor dimensionsThat factoring improves selection
DS-05category, variant and states are separated; destructive prominence varies by contextDemonstrated + DocumentedGitLab PajamasButton docs/APIhttps://design.gitlab.com/components/button/Consequence and hierarchy are orthogonalOptimal universal schema
DS-06tone, color intensity and variant are separateDemonstratedShopify PolarisWeb-component guidehttps://shopify.dev/api/pos-ui-extensions/2025-10/using-polaris-componentsFactored current public modelAgent accuracy
DS-07secondary explicitly denotes a secondary colorDocumentedUSWDSButton docshttps://designsystem.digital.gov/components/button/Cross-system collision with hierarchy meaningThat the term is unusable
DS-08Warning styling is reserved for final serious actionDocumentedGOV.UKButton docshttps://design-system.service.gov.uk/components/button/Workflow stage affects presentationGeneral agent behavior
DS-09Appearance-named Button types carry hierarchy guidance in proseDemonstrated + DocumentedMaterial WebButton docshttps://material-web.dev/components/button/Appearance names need usage rulesRelative machine performance
DS-10variant is explicitly visual while color, contrast and loading are separateDemonstratedRadix ThemesButton APIhttps://www.radix-ui.com/themes/docs/components/buttonClean appearance model is possibleProduct-intent selection quality
AI-01Tool metadata alignment, descriptions and pretraining exposure affect selectionEmpirical adjacent evidenceLLM tool callingBiasBustershttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/biasbusters-uncovering-and-mitigating-tool-selection-bias-in-large-language-models/Models use semantic metadata and learned priorsDesign-system naming effect
AI-02Overlapping tool names/descriptions reduce selection performanceEmpirical adjacent evidenceLLM tool callingToolScopehttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20036Confusable schemas are harderUI design causality
AI-03Similar tools and relationships create selection challenges; relational experience helpsEmpirical adjacent evidenceLLM tool callingToolExpNethttps://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.811/Alternatives/relations can aid selectionSpecific component architecture
AI-04Renaming tool and parameter identifiers while holding descriptions/examples/tasks fixed changes tool selection and parameter identificationEmpirical adjacent evidenceLLM tool callingPA-Toolhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07248Tool/parameter names are causal signals in the tested settingsEnum-value naming or design-system selection effects
AI-05Noise and opacity in tool/parameter names reduce robustness across tool-use stagesEmpirical adjacent evidenceLLM tool callingRoTBenchhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08326Name robustness matters in tool schemasIsolated enum-value or design-system effects
AI-06Intent-aligned endpoint names and name–description conflict materially change selection in a controlled technical reportEmpirical adjacent evidence; non-peer-reviewed reportAPI method selectionHood semantic method naminghttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6460766Method names and conflicts can affect frontier-model selection and calibrationGeneralization to enum values; peer-reviewed confirmation
AI-07Hard decoding constraints can improve structural validity while lowering semantic/executable correctness in tested small modelsEmpirical adjacent evidenceStructured generationConstraint Taxhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26128Validity and correctness must be measured separatelyOptimal design-system constraint architecture
AI-08Joint optimisation of a tool name and description can strongly bias tool selectionEmpirical adjacent evidence; preprint/under reviewLLM tool selectionToolTweakhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02554Tool metadata is a causal attack surface when name and description are changed togetherName-only effects, enum-value effects or design-system selection effects
CV-01Concepts are separable from preferred/alternate labels, definitions and relationsDocumentedControlled vocabulariesSKOS Referencehttps://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/Labels need not be canonical identityExecutable design rules
CV-02Roles, states and properties are distinct semantic kinds with constraintsDocumentedAccessibilityWAI-ARIA 1.2https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.2/Typed semantics and conformance matterProduct intent semantics
NEG-01No credible public direct design-system naming experiment was locatedNot establishedCross-domain reviewSearch boundaryn/aA direct evidence gap existsThat no private or future study exists
NEG-02No verified controlled study in the reviewed bundle isolates enum-value names while holding property name, descriptions, behavior, tasks and choices fixedNot establishedSchema enum selectionBundle auditn/aThe closest naming question remains an experiment, not a conclusionThat enum names have no effect